Test scope
Onboarding redesign
Activation rate vs. existing flow
- Activation
- 62%+18 pp
- Time to value
- −38%vs. control
- 7-day retention
- +14%vs. control
We turn an idea into a live test in days, watch real users meet it, and end the week with a clear build-or-kill decision.
Not a prototype. Not a deliverable. A decision, in writing, with the data behind it.
When this matters
BuildLess is for teams who want real user signal before they commit weeks of engineering. If any of these read as familiar, let's talk.
You're about to commit weeks of engineering, and you're not sure the idea actually works.
You have hypotheses for why, but no clean way to test which change moves the needle.
A backlog of bets, no consensus, no signal. You need to know which one to commit to first.
Before you commit engineering time. Behavior data, not opinions in a meeting.
How it works
We scope your riskiest assumption, build a lightweight test, and track real user behavior to give you a clear answer.
We start by scoping the riskiest assumption — the thing you can't answer from a doc, a Loom, or another internal debate. That's what we test.
A lightweight version in days, plugged into your product or a standalone flow. Just enough to put the assumption in front of real users.
Events, funnels, session replay so you see exactly where users convert, drop off, or get confused.
Build, iterate, or kill. Every sprint ends with a written recommendation backed by behavior data, not vibes.
What you get
Not a pitch deck. Not a prototype. A working test in front of real users, with the data to make a decision.
Not a mockup. An actual experience your users used. We build it, ship it, and watch what happens.
Conversion, engagement, drop-off points, session replay. The full record of what users did.
Build, iterate, or kill — with the reasoning behind it. You walk away with a decision, not a debrief.
Test scope
Onboarding redesign
Activation rate vs. existing flow
Sample sprintone of 47
Why BuildLess
We help you find out what actually works before you commit.
01
Most tests go live within one to two weeks. We scope tightly and ship fast.
02
We handle the build, the instrumentation, and the analysis. You focus on the decision.
What makes us different
We're not a dev shop. We're a product learning partner that combines speed with structured testing.
We scope and ship tests in days, not sprints. Your engineering team stays focused on the roadmap while we run the test.
We help you decide what to test, how to test it, and what the results actually mean.
Build, iterate, or kill. You walk away knowing what to do next, not just what we shipped.
Common questions
You can, but it usually means pulling engineers off the roadmap for weeks, only to find out the idea needs major changes. Most teams test ideas by overbuilding them. We focus on the smallest version that still gives you a clear answer.
Prototypes show how something could work. We go further: we put a working version in front of real users, track their behavior, and give you data to make a decision. It is not a demo. It is a live test.
Real user data: conversion rates, engagement patterns, drop-off points, and session recordings. Plus a clear recommendation on whether to build, iterate, or kill the idea.
Most sprints go from kickoff to live test in under two weeks. Some ideas can be in front of users within days. It depends on complexity, but speed is the whole point.
Pricing
A single wrong build can cost two to six weeks of engineering time. A validation sprint helps you avoid that.
Plan 01
1–2 weeks
Typical: $8k–$15k
Test one high-risk idea and get a clear build-or-kill decision.
Plan 02
Ongoing
Recommended for product teams
For teams running multiple tests across their roadmap.
Plan 03
Flexible
For larger or specific scopes
For teams with specific constraints or larger-scale needs.
Address
Calgary, AB · Montreal, QC